Skip to main content

About your Search

20110701
20110731
Search Results 0 to 3 of about 4 (some duplicates have been removed)
-coverage or visit travelers.com. >>> the scandal shaking up the murdoch empire in britain has now reached this shores with some asking whether news corp's activity here in the united states should be scrutinized. today frank lautenberg submitted a letter to the attorney general where he wrote the limited information already reported in this case raises serious questions about the legality of the conduct of news corporation and its subsidiaries under the fcpa. he goes on to say further investigation may reveal that current reports only scratch the surface of the problems at news corporation. accordingly, i am request that doj and the s.e.c. examine these circumstances and determine whether u.s. laws have been violated. the senator's letter mirrors similar outrage from senator rockefeller from west virginia and senator robert menendez of new jersey and today brought news that murdoch abandoned his bid to take over british sky broadcasting. the question remains how much power should one media baron have. joining us now is stephanie gosk. the withdrawal to the bskyb bid is a blow to rupert mu
of the probe of allegations of criminal misconduct by news corp., and a sign that britain's scandal is truly becoming an america reality. for the latest, i'm joined by martin fletcher in london. martin, david cameron says that the murdochs will have, and i'm quoting him, questions to answer. so that must mean that they may be dragged back to westminster. is that right? >> well, absolutely. you know, this is the accusations that are still rather published by the two former executives and by the way, they are not just former executi executives, but one was a executive of the firm and one was a top lawyer of the firm, and they say they had given james information when he was in charge of the committee, and so if it is proven that james murdoch was in possession of the information when he told the parliament committee that he had not been in possession of the information, that is serious indeed. much bigger problems to comen than what we have seen already. >> indeed. rupert has returned home to america. >> potentially. >> and it seems that the scandal has followed him because the justice departm
more than britain and china and france and russia combined. and at this point, osama bin laden is dead. so even the military recognizes that we are overspending in defense, but in some ways it is easier for the republicans to cut military spending, because the democrats are terrified of looking weak on national security, and then the real constraints of how much to cut without hurting or national security. and some reports say we could save up to $10 trillion in the next ten years, and heather h e holbert served on the panel, and is joining us here now. how can we cut the deficit by over $700 billion? >> well, the biggest drivers have nothing to do with the wars. they are going to be familiar, health care and personnel costs. so the first question is, are we willing to ask the military to go through the same modernizations that us in the civilian economy have been going through in several years. we have an addiction in both parties. the democrats don't want to look weak on defense, and republicans like to look strong on defense for policies that are looking smart to defense. we have a
Search Results 0 to 3 of about 4 (some duplicates have been removed)